A priced service catalog
Services are set up and priced the way products are, so quoting and invoicing draws from a real catalog instead of a number someone remembers or re-types.
Farexa treats a service the same way it treats a product - priced, sold, and reported on - so a consultancy, agency, or trade business gets invoices, follow-ups, and expense tracking against real customer records instead of a chat thread and a spreadsheet.
Updated
A service business's operational problem is usually invisible until someone tries to answer a simple question: which client, or which service, is actually profitable? When the invoice sits in one tool, the expenses in another, and the follow-up in someone's memory, that question doesn't have a real answer - just an estimate.
Farexa lists a service the same way it lists a product: priced, catalogued, ready to quote and invoice from. Inquiries captured for that service become CRM records with a status and an owner, so a follow-up is a task the team can see, not a promise made in a chat thread that gets buried.
Because the invoice and the job's expenses both post against the same customer record, profitability isn't a spreadsheet exercise at quarter end - it's a report that already has the data it needs, because the data was never split across five different places to begin with.
Services are set up and priced the way products are, so quoting and invoicing draws from a real catalog instead of a number someone remembers or re-types.
Invoices raised for a job and expenses incurred delivering it both post against the same customer, so profitability per client - or per service - is a report, not a guess.
Inquiries land in CRM as records with a status and an owner, so a follow-up is a task someone can see, not a promise made in a chat thread.
List services with their own pricing, and give staff the role-based access that matches what they actually handle.
Raise an invoice from the service catalog, and post job-related expenses against the same customer record the invoice sits on.
Reports connect sales, expenses, and customer activity, so which service or which client is actually profitable is something you can read, not estimate.
A service catalog and customer records replace the chat thread and spreadsheet with something the whole team can see.
Invoices draw from the same priced catalog every time, and CRM keeps follow-ups as visible tasks, not memory.
Invoices and expenses sitting on the same customer record turn "which service makes money" into a report instead of a guess.
Yes. Services are set up and priced the same way products are, so quoting and invoicing draw from a real catalog rather than a figure typed in from memory each time.
Yes. An invoice raised for a job and the expenses incurred delivering it both post against the same customer record, so profitability per client or per service is something you can read in a report.
An inquiry becomes a CRM record with a status and an owner, so a follow-up is a visible task rather than something that depends on someone remembering a conversation.
The service-catalog and CRM structure is generic enough to fit any business that sells time or expertise rather than stock - the specific service list is yours to define.
Book a walkthrough with your real service list, and follow one job from inquiry to invoice to expense.